M365 Emarketing Uploads Document Library
Format: .pdf
.pdf 📖 25 min read 📝 4,881 words

20250308 Geoenviropro Remediation Resource List SEIMA Rev3

GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 1 Contents Context ...................................................................................................................................

Executive Summary / Key Points

  • Document covers topics in M365 Emarketing Uploads Document Library.
  • Contains approximately 4881 words in excerpt.
  • Available in digital format for online reading.

GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 1 Contents Context .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Access to Documents (General) .................................................................................................................... 2 Recommended Remediation Web Repositories/Resources to Explore ....................................................... 3 Specific References ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Our Favorite Poster of All Time ................................................................................................................. 5 Background/Foundational General Knowledge ........................................................................................ 5 Remedy Selection and Overview .............................................................................................................. 6 Basic Site Work (Construction Means & Methods) .................................................................................. 7 Routinely Updated (Typ. Annual) Sources for Equipment Cost Data ....................................................... 8 Pump & Treat; Hydraulic Containment ..................................................................................................... 8 Permeable (Passive) Reactive Barriers ...................................................................................................... 9 Containment, Solidification and/or Stabilisation .................................................................................... 11 Bio and Phyto Remediation .................................................................................................................... 12 Electro (Chemical, Osmotic and Kinetic) ................................................................................................. 13 In Situ ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 SVE, MPE & Air Sparging ......................................................................................................................... 14 Thermal ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Dredging and Sediment .......................................................................................................................... 15 Contractors & Suppliers Frequently Referenced/Consulted by GeoEnviroPro .......................................... 15 Revision and Copywrite/Licensing Data ...................................................................................................... 15 Context This list represents a peer-sourced list of valuable references for remediation practitioners. Section headers are intended to be self-explanatory - refer to the table of contents. Document is issued for free use under a creative commons license - see final section. Note that because environmental quality is a pressing public policy issue, and because various NGOs and industry initiatives have become deeply involved, a truly VAST amount of high-quality, well-researched GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 2 guidance, case study, design protocol, data requirement, specification and schematic information is available to anyone, for free. Isaac Newton “stood on the shoulders of giants” to see a bit further; you can, too! This list is typically distributed in support of GeoEnviroPro short and long seminars on Remediation – these sources are referred to many times in the slide and discussion. Regardless of how you encounter this list, we encourage you to contact the originators to: (a) make sure you have the latest revision, and (b) with your own comments and suggestions. Resources for safe, efficient, timely, cost-effective site remediation should be spread as widely as possible! Contact: [email protected] Guy Patrick: [email protected] Pete Craig: [email protected] ; [email protected] Access to Documents (General) If you have trouble finding any of the references, contact GeoEnviroPro. Legit Sources  Links provided throughout this document (which were active at time of last revision).  Corporate or Academic/Library Access (e.g., https://www.sciencedirect.com/). Note that some public library systems or their reference librarians (those unsung heroes of human progress) have access points to otherwise paywalled material.  Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/  Academia: https://www.academia.edu/  Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/  Free JSTOR account - http://www.jstor.org/  See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases_and_search_engines Open Access Journals (Quality Varies Massively - Pete is Not a Fan)  Directory of Open Access Journals (>16,000) - www.doaj.org  Frontiers (Open Access Publisher) - www.frontiersin.org  OMICS (Open Access Publisher & Conference Organiser) www.omicsonline.org/open- access.php  Public Library of Science (Open Access Publisher) - www.plos.org Common Sources to be Extremely Cautious of or Avoid (Often Involve Violations of Copyright Law, Depending on the Item)  #Icanhazpdf: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICanHazPDF  Libgen – Mirrored, search “Libgen”. Currently http://libgen.is/ is up.  Sci-Hub – Mirrored, search “Sci-Hub”. Currently https://sci-hub.se/ is up GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 3  Z- lib - https://z-lib.io/ Zlib’s original site was seized by US authorities attacking Russian organized crime. Recommended Remediation Web Repositories/Resources to Explore (Australia) Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE) National Remediation Framework (NRF): https://crccare.com/download-nrf-guidelines/ - Complete set of recommended remediation plan development practices + technology guides (Canada) Guidance and Orientation for the Selection of Technologies (GOST): https://gost.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/index.aspx?lang=eng – Use the interactive questionnaire to identify potentially applicable remediation technologies. Run by Canada/PSPC. Requires registration. (Canada) Sustainable development analysis tool (SDAT): https://sdat.pwgsc.gc.ca/index.aspx?lang=eng - Use the interactive questionnaire to conduct a sustainability evaluation of your project concept. Run by Canada/PSPC. Requires registration. (UK) Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE) Library: https://claire.co.uk/information-centre/cl-aire-publications?start=1 AACE – International Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering: https://web.aacei.org/resources/recommended-practices (in particular, RP 10S-90, 47R-11 and 18R-97) American Petroleum Industry (API), re: LNAPL: https://www.api.org/oil-and-natural- gas/environment/clean-water/ground-water/lnapl Applied NAPL Science Review (ANSR): www.naplansr.com/ ASTM International: e.g., https://www.astm.org/Standards/E2893.htm Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, Inc., (ASTSWMO): Emerging Contaminants - https://astswmo.org/cec-publications/ ; CERCLA and Brownfields - https://astswmo.org/cercla-and-brownfields-publications/ CRC/Routledge Press: https://www.routledge.com/our-products/books [ The CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics is one of the best available guides on chemical properties; CRC h as one of the best lines of technical publications in general, including Suthersan’s Remediation Engineering] Deep Foundations Institute (DFI) [Publishes consensus guidance and model specifications for, e.g., slurry walls and geotechnical soil mixing]: https://dfi.org/ Geo-Solutions Inc. Technical Library ( detailed technical aspects of Slurry Walls, In Situ Soil Mixing, Bio-Polymer Trenches, Reactive Barriers and Grouting): https://www.geo- solutions.com/technical-resources/ GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 4 The Groundwater Project (an amazing international collaboration that translates critical technical resources for groundwater into multiple languages and makes them available for free internationally. They also provide really amazing educational videos and visualizations): https://gw-project.org/ International Network for Acid Prevention (INAP) Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide (GARD): https://www.inap.com.au/gard-guide/ Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC) Technical Guidance on almost every aspect of remediation, including : https://itrcweb.org/guidance MIT Open Courses, 2004 Civil and Environmental Engineering Course 1.34 “Waste Containment and Remediation Technology”: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental- engineering/1-34-waste-containment-and-remediation-technology-spring-2004/lecture-notes/ [Cite as: Peter Shanahan. 1.34 Waste Containment and Remediation Technology. Spring 2004. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare, https://ocw.mit.edu . License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA.] Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF) Permeable Reactive Barriers Action Team (references through 2009 only): https://rtdf.clu-in.org/public/permbarr/barrdocs.htm Sustainable Remediation Forum (SURF) Library: https://www.sustainableremediation.org/library/ U.S. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable: https://frtr.gov/scrntools.cfm (will not work with many VPNs) U.S., Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) / Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) – Tools and Training: https://serdp- estcp.org/Tools-and-Training/Environmental-Restoration US EPA Contaminated Site Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN): Training - https://clu-in.org/training/ & Remediation Technology Resources for every major field-proven remediation technology - https://clu-in.org/remediation/ US EPA, “Remediation Technologies for Cleaning Up Contaminated Sites” – The Mothership of US Data, including the new, interactive form-based version of the FRTR screening matrix: https://www.epa.gov/remedytech/remediation-technologies-cleaning-contaminated-sites USEPA (1994, 1995, 2004, 2016 and 2017). How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies for Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide for Corrective Action Plan Reviewers. Issued in multiple parts - EPA 510-B-94-003, EPA 510-B-95-007; EPA 510-R-04-002; EPA 510-B-16-005; and EPA 510-B-17-003 (original & updates with supplemental chapters) https://www.epa.gov/ust/how-evaluate-alternative-cleanup-technologies-underground- storage-tank-sites-guide-corrective. US National Academies Press (NAP) [publishes the reports of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine] – search by keyword and enjoy: https://www.nap.edu/ US Naval Facilities (NAVFAC) Technology Transfer Program: https://exwc.navfac.navy.mil/Products-and-Services/Environmental-Security/NAVFAC- Environmental-Restoration-and-BRAC/Training/Technology-Transfer/ GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 5 US Superfund Remedy Selection (the Granddaddy of North American RI/FS systems) https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-remedy-overview-key-principles-and-guidance US Superfund Treatment Technology Usage: https://www.epa.gov/remedytech/superfund- remedy-report US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) – Stockpiles of design guides and guide specifications to build a massive range of remedies USACE “EM” – Engineering Manuals: https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/usace- publications/engineer-manuals/ USACE “TM” – Technical Manuals: https://www.wbdg.org/ffc/army-coe/technical- manuals-tm USACE “UFGS” – Unified Facilities Guide Specifications: https://www.wbdg.org/dod USACE ETL - Engineer Technical Letter (Many no longer on-line): https://archive.tpub- products.com/content/p/id/222/ Specific References While GeoEnviroPro’s principals use and recommend the following references, the intellectual property rights reside with the originators – Search to obtain your own access (see “Access to Technical Documents (General)”, above). Feel free to contact GeoEnviroPro for assistance if your search is not fruitful, we’re happy to point you in the right direction. Our Favorite Poster of All Time U.S. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR). (Circa 2012, but still valid). Table 3-2: Treatment Technologies Screening Matrix. https://frtr.gov/matrix2/section3/table3_2.pdf Note – while this poster has not been significantly updated for over a decade, the core information remains valid. While a few additional technologies have been demonstrated at full- scale since the last revision: (a) the principals of mechanism vs. media vs. contaminant group are timeless and (b) what worked in 2012 still works and is commonly used. Background/Foundational General Knowledge AACE. (2021). Recommended Practice 107R-19: Cost Estimate Classification System – As Applied in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction for the Environmental Remediation Industries. Morgantown: AACE International. Das, B. M., Sivakugan, N., & ProQuest (Firm). (2017). Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering. Domenico, P. A., & Schwartz, F. W. (1998). Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Freeze, R.A., and Cherry, J.A., 1979, Groundwater: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 604 p. https://gw-project.org/books/groundwater/ Geotechnical Practice for Waste Disposal, D. E. Daniel (Ed.), Chapman and Hall, London,1993, 683 p GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 6 Hastak, M. (2015). Skills & Knowledge of Cost Engineering, 6th Edition. Morgantown: AACE International. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers. (1985). Water Treatment Principles and Design. New York: Wiley. Johnson, A., et al. (1985). Hydraulic Barriers in Soil and Rock: A Symposium. ASTM Committee D- 18 on Soil and Rock & the United States Committee on Large Dams. ASTM special technical publication 874 (STP874). Perry, R. H., & Green, D. W. (2019). Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook. Peters, M. S., Timmerhaus, K. D., & West, R. E. (2006). Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Koerner, R. M. (2012). Designing with Geosynthetics. United States: Xlibris Corporation. Lewis, S. P., Lewis, S. P., Sharma, H. D. (1994). Waste Containment Systems, Waste Stabilization, and Landfills: Design and Evaluation. United Kingdom: Wiley. Ringwald, R. C. (1993). Means Heavy Construction Handbook: A practical guide to estimating and accounting methods, operations/equipment requirements, hazardous site evaluation/remediation. Kingston, MA: R.S. Means Co. Rumer, R.R. and M.E. Ryan, eds. 1995. "Barrier Containment Technologies for Environmental Remediation Applications." Product of the International Containment Technology Workshop. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.. Schmitt, Robert L., Clifford J. Schexnayder, Aaron B. Cohen, Herbert L. Nichols Jr., and David Day A. (2019). Moving the Earth: Excavation Equipment, Methods, Safety, and Cost. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. Remedy Selection and Overview BC Contaminated Sites Approved Professionals Society (CSAP Society), Guidelines for Contaminated Sites Approved Professionals on Eligible Sites “Toolkit #3 – Evaluation of Remediation Technologies for Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sites” https://csapsociety.bc.ca/wp- content/uploads/T3-CSAP-Toolkit-3-Remedial-Technologies-06APR_21.pdf ITRC (2021). Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy. IDSS-2. Web Document. https://idss-2.itrcweb.org/ Kuo, J. (2014). Practical Design Calculations for Groundwater and Soil Remediation, Second Edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. LaGrega, M. D., Buckingham, P. L., Evans, J. C. (2010). Hazardous Waste Management. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, Inc. National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Assessment of the Performance of Engineered Waste Containment Barriers. ISBN 0-309-10810-1 http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11930.html Pankow, J. F., & Cherry, J. A. (1996). Dense Chlorinated Solvents and Other DNAPLs in Groundwater: History, behavior, and remediation. Portland, OR: Waterloo Press. GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 7 Suthersan, S. S., & Payne, F. C. (2005). In Situ Remediation Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Suthersan, S. S., Horst, J., Schnobrich, M., Welty, N., & McDonough, J. (2016). Remediation Engineering: Design Concepts, Second Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press. USEPA (1989). Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA - Interim Final. EPA/540-G-89-004. USEPA (1998). Evaluation of Subsurface Engineered Barriers at Waste Sites. EPA 542/R-98/005. https://www.clu-in.org/download/techdrct/tdsubsrf.pdf USEPA (2001). Groundwater Remedies Selected at Superfund Sites. EPA-542-R-01-022. USEPA (2006) In Situ Treatment Technologies for Contaminated Soil: Engineering Forum Issue Paper. EPA 542-F-06-013. https://clu-in.org/download/remed/542f06013.pdf USEPA (2007). Treatment Technologies for Mercury in Soil, Waste, and Water. EPA/542/R- 07/003.Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. https://permanent.fdlp.gov/FDLP1085/542r07003.pdf USEPA (2019). Assessing And Remediating Low Permeability Geologic Materials Contaminated By Petroleum Hydrocarbons From Leaking Underground Storage Tanks: A Literature Review. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-01/documents/final-low-permeability-12-2- 19.pdf Ward, C. H., Stroo, H. F., & Alleman, B. C. (2010). In situ remediation of chlorinated solvent plumes. New York: Springer Zhang, C. (2019). Soil and Groundwater Remediation: Fundamentals, Practices, and Sustainability. United States: Wiley. Basic Site Work (Construction Means & Methods) “Caterpillar Performance Manual” (for heavy equipment) several different years, is available from various parties as a PDF. The legality of the different copies is uncertain. Google away, the “Cat Manual” is the bible of detailed production estimate parameters for heavy equipment. “RitchieSpecs” [ https://www.ritchiespecs.com/ ] has immediate specs for many common pieces of heavy equipment, including operating width and (excavators) maximum dig depth. Bruce, D.A. (2013). Specialty Construction Techniques for Dam and Levee Remediation. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-203-83476-3. Capachi. Nick and John Capachi. (2006). Excavating & Grading Handbook Revised.3rd Edition. Craftsman Book Company: Carlsbad, CA. Cashman, P. M., & Preene, M. (2021). Groundwater Lowering in Construction: A practical guide to Dewatering. Christiansen, C. M. (2010). Methods for Enhanced Delivery of in situ Remediation Amendments in Contaminated Clay Till (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis. Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark). GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 8 Filz, G., Adams, T., and Davidson, R. (2004). "Stability of Long Trenches in Sand Supported by Bentonite-Water Slurry." J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)1090- 0241(2004)130:9(915), 915-921. Kirsch, K. and Bell, A. (2012). Ground Improvement, Third Edition. CRC Press. ISBN 9780415599214 - CAT# Y111712 Powers, J. P. (2010). Construction Dewatering and Groundwater Control: New Methods and Applications. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley. Shen, S. L., Wang, Z. F., Yang, J., and Ho, E. C. (2013). “Generalized Approach for Prediction of Jet Grout column diameter”. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000932, 2060–2069. US Army Field Manual No. 5-434, “Earthmoving Operations” (2000): https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/ USEPA (2017) Appendix A. Horizontal Remediation Wells. EPA 510-B-17-003 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-10/documents/tums-app-a-oct2017.pdf The 13 common styles of dump truck: https://www.topmarkfunding.com/types_of_dump_trucks/ Routinely Updated (Typ. Annual) Sources for Equipment Cost Data (Vancouver) Island Equipment Owners Assn. Rate Guide [Historically Free!] (https://www.ieoa.ca/rates/ ) Alberta Road Builders and Heavy Construction Association Equipment Rental Rates Guide and Member Roster ( https://www.arhca.ab.ca/shop ) BC Road Builders Association Blue Book Equipment Rental Guide (https://www.roadbuilders.bc.ca/blue-book/ ) Gordian Handscomb Yardsticks for Costing Cost Data for the Canadian Construction Industry: Yardsticks for Costing (“Handscomb’s”) Gordian RS Means Heavy Construction Costs and/or Site Work and Landscape Costs (“R.S. Means”) Ministry of Transportation (Ontario) Provincial Standard Specification (OPSS) 127, Schedule of Rental Rates for Construction Equipment. (https://tcp.mto.gov.on.ca/search ) [Free! WARNING: in 2020, the rate calculations changed and new OPS 127 rates do not work with old versions of OPS Municipal Conditions. Refer to https://municipalengineers.on.ca/news- information.html?id=239 ) SHCA Equipment Rental & Rates Guide (Saskatchewan Heavy Construction Association) Pump & Treat; Hydraulic Containment Driscoll, Fletcher G. Groundwater and Wells. Second Edition. Johnson Screens, 1986. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) (2014). Guidance for Ground Water/Fuel Extraction and Ground Water Injection Systems. Inactive. Comprises USACE DG 1110-1-1 (1999). GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 9 USACE (2021). Dewatering: Methods, Evaluation, Design Installation and Performance Monitoring. ETL 1110-2-586. USEPA (1992). Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat Remediation, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) and Office of Research and Development. EPA/540-S-92-001. USEPA (1994). Manual - Groundwater and Leachate Treatment Systems, EPA/625-R-94-005. USEPA (1996). Pump-and-Treat Ground-Water Remediation : A Guide for Decision Makers and Practitioners. EPA/625-R-95-005. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=30004PC8.txt USEPA (1997). Ground Water Issue Design Guidelines for Conventional Pump and Treat Systems. EPA/540-S-97-504. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=10002E0Q.txt USEPA (2002). Elements for Effective Management of Operating Pump and Treat Systems. EPA 542-R-02-009 USEPA (2005). Cost-Effective Design of Pump And Treat Systems. EPA/542-R-05-008. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=30006JV1.txt USEPA (2008). A Systematic Approach for Evaluation of Capture Zones at Pump and Treat Systems - Final Report. EPA 600/R-08/003 Permeable (Passive) Reactive Barriers Battelle (2002). Cost and Performance Report – Evaluating the Longevity and Hydraulic Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers at Department for Defense Sites. Technical Report TR-2213-ENV. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) and Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP). Benner, S.G., Blowes, D.W., Gould, W.D., Herbert Jr., R.B., Ptacek, C.J. (1999). “Geochemistry of a permeable reactive barrier for metals and acid mine drainage.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 2793- 2799. Benner, S.G., Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J. (1997). “A full-scale porous reactive wall for prevention of acid mine drainage.” Ground Water Monit. Rem. 17, 99-107. Benson, C., Lee, S., and Oren, A. (2008). “Evaluation of three organoclays for an adsorptive barrier to manage DNAPL and dissolved-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in ground water.” Geo Engineering Rep. No. 08-24, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI. Birke, V., Burmeier, H., et al. (2003). "Design, construction, and operation of tailored permeable reactive barriers." Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 7: 264-280. Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J., Benner, S.G., McRae, C.W.T., Bennett, T.A., Puls, R.W. (2000). ”Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 45, 123-137. Boldt-Leppin, B. E. J., Haug, M. D., and Headley, J. V. (1996). “Use of organophilic clay in sand- bentonite as a barrier to diesel fuel.” Can. Geotech. J., 33(5), 705–719. GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 10 CRC CARE (2016). Guidance document: A framework for selecting, designing and implementing a permeable reactive barrier system. CRC CARE Technical Report No. 25. CRC for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment, Newcastle, Australia. Day, S.R., O'Hannesin, S.F., Marsden, L. (1999) Geotechnical techniques for the construction of reactive barriers. J Hazard Mater. 1999 Jun 30;67(3):285-97. Doherty, R., Phillips, D. H. et al. (2006). "Development of modified flyash as a permeable reactive barrier medium for a former manufactured gas plant site, Northern Ireland." Environmental Geology 50: 37–46. Fenton, O., Healy, M.G., Brennan, F., Jahangir, M.M.R., Lanigan, G.J., Richards, K.G., Thornton, S.F., & Ibrahim, T.G. (2014). Permeable reactive interceptors: blocking diffuse nutrient and greenhouse gases losses in key areas of the farming landscape. Journal Agricultural Science (1) 1- 11 Fenton, O., Healy, M.G., Brennan, F., Jahangir, M.M.R., Lanigan, G.J., Richards, K.G., Thornton, S.F., Ibrahim, T.G. (2014).”Permeable reactive interceptors: blocking diffuse nutrient and greenhouse gases losses in key areas of the farming landscape.” Journal Of Agricultural Science, 152 :S71-S81. Gavaskar, A., Gupta, N., Sass, B., Janosy, R., & Hicks, J. (2000). Design Guidance for Application of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Groundwater Remediation. Columbus, OH, Battelle. Gavaskar, A., Yoon, W. S. et al. (2005). Long term performance assessment of a permeable reactive barrier at former naval air station Moffett Field. Columbus, Ohio, Battelle. Gibert, O., Ferguson, A. S. et al. (2007). "Performance of a sequential reactive barrier for bioremediation of coal tar contaminated groundwater." Environmental Science & Technology 41: 6795-6801. Guerin, T. F., Horner, S. et al. (2002). "An application of permeable reactive barrier technology to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater." Water Research 36: 15–24. Ibrahim, T.G., Goutelle, A., Healy, M.G. et al. (2015) “Mixed Agricultural Pollutant Mitigation Using Woodchip/Pea Gravel and Woodchip/Zeolite Permeable Reactive Interceptors.” Water Air Soil Pollut 226: 51. ITRC (1999). Regulatory Guidance for Permeable Reactive Barriers Designed to Remediate Chlorinated Solvents, 2nd Edition. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation (ITRC), December 1999, document available from http://www.itrcweb.org . ITRC (1999). Regulatory Guidance for Permeable Reactive Barriers Designed to Remediate Inorganic and Radionuclide Contamination. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation (ITRC), September 1999, document available from http://www.itrcweb.org . ITRC (2000). Design Guidance for Application of Permeable Barriers for Groundwater Remediation. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation (ITRC), March 2000, document available from http://www.itrcweb.org . ITRC (2005). Permeable Reactive Barriers: Lessons Learned/New Directions. PRB-4. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Permeable Reactive Barriers Team. Available on the Internet at www.itrcweb.org . GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 11 ITRC (2011). Permeable Reactive Barrier: Technology Update. PRB-5. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, PRB: Technology Update Team. Available on the Internet at www.itrcweb.org. Li, L., & Benson, C.H (2010). Evaluation of five strategies to limit the impact of fouling in permeable reactive barriers. J. Hazard. Mater. 181 (1–3), 170–180. McGovern, T., T. F. Guerin, et al. (2002). "Design, construction and operation of a funnel and gate in-situ permeable reactive barrier for remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater." Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 136: 11–31. Meggyes, T. and Simon, F.G. (2000). "Removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from groundwater using permeable reactive barriers: Part 2. Engineering of permeable reactive barriers." Land Contamination & Reclamation 8: 175-187. Obiri-Nyarko, F., Grajales-Mesa, S.J., and Malina G (2014). “An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation.” Chemosphere. 111: 243-59. Penn, C. J., McGrath, J. M., Rounds, E., Fox, G., & Heeren, D. (2012). “Trapping phosphorus in runoff with a phosphorus removal structure.” Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(3), 672–679. Powell, R.M., Blowes, D.W., Gillham, R.W., Schultz, D., Sivavec, T., Puls, R.W., Vogan, J.L., Powell, P.D., & Landis, R. (1998). Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation. Report EPA/600/R-98/125, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 51pp Scherer, Michelle M. , Richter, Sascha , Valentine, Richard L. and Alvarez, Pedro J. J.(2000) “Chemistry and Microbiology of Permeable Reactive Barriers for In Situ Groundwater Clean up”, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 30: 3, 363 — 411 Simon, F.G. and Meggyes, T. (2000). "Removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from groundwater using permeable reactive barriers: Part 1. Treatment processes for pollutants." Land Contamination & Reclamation 8: 103-116. Snape, I., C. E. Morris, et al. (2001). "The use of permeable reactive barriers to control contaminant dispersal during site remediation in Antarctica." Cold Regions Science and Technology 32: 157–174. Thiruvenkatachari, R., S. Vigneswaran, et al. (2008). "Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation." Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 14: 145–156. Tiehm, A., A. Müller, et al. (2008). "Development of a groundwater biobarrier for the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, BTEX, and heterocyclic hydrocarbons." Water Science & Technology 58: 1349-1355 Containment, Solidification and/or Stabilisation Al Tabbaa, A. and Stegemann, J.A. (2005). “Stabilisation/Solidification Treatment and Remediation - Advances in S/S for Waste and Contaminated Land”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Stabilisation/Solidification Treatment and Remediation, 12-13 April 2005, Cambridge, UK. CRC Press. ISBN 978041537447. GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 12 Andromalos, K. B., and Bahner, E. W. (2003). “The Application of Various Deep Mixing Methods for Excavation Support Systems”. Proc., Third Int. Conf.: Grouting and Ground Treatment, ASCE, Reston, VA, Vol. 120, 515–526. Andromalos, K. B., and Bahner, E. W. (2003). “The Application of Various Deep Mixing Methods for Excavation Support Systems”. Proc., Third Int. Conf.: Grouting and Ground Treatment, ASCE, Reston, VA, Vol. 120, 515–526. Conner, J. R. (1997). Guide to Improving the Effectiveness of Cement-Based Stabilization/Solidification. Portland Cement Association. ISBN 0-89312-176-2. Deep Foundations Institute (DFI). (2016) Guidelines for Soil Mixing. Evans, J.C. (2008). "Alamitos Gap: A Case Study Using the Trench Remixing and Deep Wall Method“. Sixth International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/6icchge/session05/1 Hills, C. and Bates, E. (2015). Stabilization and Solidification of Contaminated Soil and Waste: A Manual of Practice. Hygge Media. ISBN-13: 978-0993272943. https://clu- in.org/download/techfocus/stabilization/S-S-Manual-of -Practice.pdf ITRC (2011). Development of Performance Specifications for Solidification/Stabilization. S/S-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Solidification/Stabilization Team. Qian, X. , R. M. Koerner, and D. H. Gray. Geotechnical Aspects of Landfill Design and Construction. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2002. Bio and Phyto Remediation Chaineau, C.H., et al. (2005). Effect of nutrient concentration on the biodegradation of crude oil and associated microbial populations in the soil. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 37:1490-1497. Delille, D., Duval, A. and Pelletier, E. (2008). Highly efficient pilot biopiles for on-site fertilization treatment of diesel oil-contaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 54:7-18. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.09.003. Gomez, F. and University of Ottawa. (2014). Assessment and Optimization of Ex-Situ Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soil under Cold Temperature Conditions. Thesis. Government of Canada (2006). Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP), Federal Guidelines for Landfarming Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils. Editorial Update 2013. ISBN no. 978-1-100-22284-4. Cat. no. En14-19/3-2013E-PDF Healy, M.G., Ibrahim, T.G., Lanigan, G.J., Serrenho, A.J., & Fenton, O. (2012). Nitrate removal rate, efficiency and pollution swapping potential of different organic carbon media in laboratory denitrification bioreactors. Ecol. Eng. 40, 198–209 Huesemann, M. H. (1994) Guidelines for land-treating petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Journal of Soil Contamination. 3:3. 299-318. DOI: 10.1080/15320389409383471 I nternational Centre for Soil and Contaminated Sites, Manual for Biological Remediation Techniques (2006). Dessau. (German Federal Environmental Agency) https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3065.pdf GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 13 Linn, D.M., and J.W. Doran. (1984). Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:1267-1272. McCarthy, Kathleen, et. al. (2004). Remediation of spilled petroleum hydrocarbons by in situ landfarming at an arctic site. Cold Regions Science and Technology. Vol. 40. Issues 1–2. 31-39. ISSN 0165-232X Mohn, W.W., and Stewart, G.R. (2000). Limiting factors for hydrocarbon biodegradation at low temperature in Arctic soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 32. no. 8-9. 1161-1172 NAVFAC (1996). Biopile Design and Construction Manual. TM-2189-ENV. https://clu- in.org/download/techfocus/bio/Biopile-design-and-construction-1996-tm-2189.pdf Pope, D.F. and J.E. Matthews (1993) Bioremediation Using the Land Treatment Concept, EPA Report EPA/600/R-93/164. US EPA (1994). Chapter IV. Biopiles. EPA 510-R-04-002 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch4.pdf USEPA (1994) Engineering Bulletin In Situ Biodegradation Treatment. EPA-540-S-94-502. USEPA (1994). Chapter III. Bioventing. EPA 510-B-17-003 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch3.pdf USEPA (1994) Chapter VIII Biosparging. EPA 510-B-94-003. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch8.pdf USEPA (1994) Chapter V Landfarming. EPA 510-B-94-003. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch5.pdf USEPA (1995) Chapter X In-Situ Groundwater Bioremediation. EPA 510-B-95-007. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch10.pdf USEPA (1995). Manual – Principles and Practices of Bioventing Volume II: Bioventing Design. EPA/540-R-95-534a. USEPA (2004). Chapter XII Enhanced Aerobic Bioremediation. EPA 510-R-04-002. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch12.pdf USEPA (2016) Chapter 14. Enhanced Anerobic Oxidative Bioremediation. EPA 510-B-16-005 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-11/documents/tum-ch14-rev.pdf Von Fahnestock, F.M., et al. (1998) Biopile Design, Operation and Maintenance Handbook for Treating Hydrocarbon Hydrocarbon-impacted Soils. Battelle Press. 1998. Whyte L.G., Bourbonniere L, Bellerose C, Greer CW (2010) Bioremediation assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils from the high arctic. Bioremediation J. 3: 69-80. DOI: 10.1080/10889869991219217 Electro (Chemical, Osmotic and Kinetic) Yeung, A.T and Gu, Y. (2011). “A Review on Techniques to Enhance Electrochemical Remediation of Contaminated Soils” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 195, 2011, Pages 11-29, ISSN 0304-3894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.047 GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 14 In Situ CRC CARE (2018). Technology Guide: In-Situ Chemical Oxidation ITRC (2020). Optimizing Injection Strategies and In situ Remediation Performance. OIS-ISRP-1. Web Document. https://ois-isrp-1.itrcweb.org/ois-isrp-1_full_pdf_2_22_20.pdf NAVFAC (2003). Surfactant-Enhanced Aquifer Remediation (SEAR) Implementation Manual. NFESC Technical Report TR-2219-ENV. NAVFAC (2013). Best Practices for Injection and Distribution of Amendments, TR-NAVFAC EXWC- EV-1303. NAVFAC (2013). Design and Quality Assurance/Quality Control Considerations for In Situ Chemical Oxidation, TM-NAVFACEXWC-EV-1302. USEPA (2004). Chapter XII Enhanced Aerobic Bioremediation. EPA 510-R-04-002. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch12.pdf SVE, MPE & Air Sparging Sale, Tom & Newell, Charles. (2011). A Guide for Selecting Remedies for Subsurface Releases of Chlorinated Solvents. ESTCP Project ER-9808 (2002) - Design Paradigm, Air Sparging: Technology Transfer and Multi-Site Evaluation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277763156_A_Guide_for_Selecting_Remedies_for_ Subsurface_Releases_of_Chlorinated_Solvents/link/57a66e4a08ae455e85414e5d/download USACE (1997). In Situ Air Sparging. EM 1110-1-4005. SUPERSEEDED by EM 200-1-19 USACE (1999). Multi-Phase Extraction. EM 1110-1-4010. USACE (2001). Air Stripping. DG 1110-1-3 USACE (2001). Adsorption Design Guide. DG 1110-1-2 USACE (2002). Soil Vapor Extraction and Bioventing. EM 1110-1-4001. USACE (2013). In Situ Air Sparging. EM 200-1-19. USEPA (1997). Presumptive Remedy Supplemental Bulletin Multi-Phase Extraction (MPE) Technology For VOCs In Soil and Groundwater. EPA/540-F-97-004. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=2000L29B.txt USEPA (1994) Chapter II Soil Vapour Extraction. EPA 510-B-94-003. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch2.pdf USEPA (1994) Chapter VII Air Sparging. EPA 510-B-94-003. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch7.pdf USEPA (1995) Chapter XI Dual-Phase Extraction. EPA 510-B-95-007. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch11.pdf GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 15 Thermal Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) (2006). Design: In Situ Thermal Remediation. UFC 3-280-05. https://clu-in.org/download/contaminantfocus/dnapl/Treatment_Technologies/USACE- In_Situ_Thermal_Design.pdf USEPA (1994) Chapter VI Low-Temperature Thermal Desroption. EPA 510-B-94-003. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-03/documents/tum_ch6.pdf USACE (2014). Design: In Situ Thermal Remediation. EM 200-1-21. Dredging and Sediment Bridges, Todd S., et al. "The four R's of environmental dredging: resuspension, release, residual and risk." (2008). Ghosh, U., Luthy, R.G., Cornelissen, G., Werner, D. and Menzie, C.A., 2011. In-situ sorbent amendments: a new direction in contaminated sediment management. Environmental Science and Technology (45) 1163-1168. Palermo, M., N. Francingues, and D. Averett. 2003. “Equipment Selection Factors for Environmental Dredging,” Proceedings, 23rd Annual Meeting of the Western Dredging Association (WEDA XXIII) and 35 th Annual Texas A&M Dredging Seminar, Chicago, IL. Contractors & Suppliers Frequently Referenced/Consulted by GeoEnviroPro VEI Contracting Inc. (Formerly Vertex Environmental): https://vertexenvironmental.ca Patrick Consulting Inc.: http://www.patrickenv.com Canada Geo-Solutions: https://www.geo-solutions.ca (ask for Dan Ruffing) Chemco (the ever-quotable Jean Paré): http://www.chemco-inc.com/home Revision and Copywrite/Licensing Data Last Rev. 2022-01-21 Minor updates and copy corrections March 2025 Ed. Pete Craig (https://www.linkedin.com/in/pete-craig-39614313/ ) Major Contributors: Guy Patrick (https://www.linkedin.com/in/guy-patrick-63429a69/ ) Ben Sweet (https://www.linkedin.com/in/ben-sweet-meng-41b71a61/) Ian Hers (https://www.linkedin.com/in/ianhersenviro/ ) Brett Reynolds (Shell) This reference list was originally developed and distributed in support of a 2021 two-lecture course module on “Contaminated Sites Fundamentals” with respect to remediation of contaminated soil, sediment, groundwater and soil vapour. It listed references from the presentation slides and then added additional material intended to be a reasonable “starter kit” of cheap or free technical resources – from which relatively new parties to contaminated sites remediation could springboard. GeoEnviroPro Resource List Environmental Remediation Fundamentals Rev. March 2025 www.geoenviropro.com 16 [GeoEnviroPro “Contaminated Sites Fundamentals”, Module 7, “Remediation”. June 2021. It has subsequently been revised for use in support of multiple courses and seminars. This work (listing and interpretation) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. All referenced materials are entirely the property of their owners, who retain all rights. This listing is entirely and absolutely casual and subjective; it is shared as a pro-bono friendly gesture and professional courtesy without any liability for use or reliance on it or the items listed. It is not complete or comprehensive, and the accuracy/sufficiency/reliability of any of the resources noted is not warrantied. Link viability and future access are not assured. Omission of useful resources is in no way judgemental or pejorative, please contact the authors to have the next revision of this lis t updated. GeoEnviroPro appreciates the assistance of both Patrick Consulting Inc. ( http://www.patrickenv.com ) and VEI Contracting Inc. (https://vertexenvironmental.ca/ ) through their willingness to allow Mr. Patrick & Mr. Craig to support remediation courses via moonlighting.