ExecutiveSummaries All Final

A Publication of the National Council on Administrative Fellowships (NCAF) August 2022 2021 - 2022 NCAF Benchmarking Survey Executive Summaries 1 National Council on Administrative Fellowships 2021-2022 Benchmarking Surveys Summary Introduction The National Council on Administrative Fellowships (NCAF) is a premier program of the National Center for Healthcare Leadership (NCHL) that brings both healthcare management graduate programs and administrative fellowships sites together to build a national pipeline of future healthcare leaders. NCAF members consist of 83 fellowship sites and 40 graduate programs. The direction of NCAF is monitored and set by the NCAF Steering Committee, which includes the work of the Benchmarking, Research, and Metrics Workgroup and the Emerging Leaders Workgroup. In addition to shared benchmarking, members participate in the centralized application service to recruit fellows, discussion boards, and educational opportunities. All members agree to abide by the guidelines of the NCAF Code of Good Practice, which includes upholding uniform application dates and helps to coordinate the recruitment and offer process across fellowship programs. Overview The National Council on Administrative Fellowships (NCAF) completed the 5 th annual benchmarking survey for students and applicants and the 7 th annual benchmarking survey for fellowship sites, graduate programs, and fellows after a two-year hiatus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Over 480 hospitals, health systems, students, graduate programs, and administrative fellows responded to these surveys between January and March of 2022. Respondents provided recruitment data, anecdotal feedback on the early careerist experience and career trajectory, Centralized Application Service (NAFCAS) satisfaction, and information fellowship opportunities and graduate programs. This data collection process is designed to monitor dynamics within the field of administrative fellowships and healthcare management education, as well as the impact of NCAF activity on outcomes. Within this overview you will find analysis from all four of the NCAF Benchmarking Surveys including the: •Fellowship Site Benchmarking Survey •Graduate Program Benchmarking Survey •Student Benchmarking Survey •Administrative Fellow Benchmarking Survey Definitions Graduate Programs – Described as respondents to the annual benchmarking survey that are graduate programs in health management. Fellowship Sites (Sites) – Described as respondents to the annual benchmarking survey that are healthcare organizations (hospitals, health systems, etc.) that sponsor at least one administrative fellowship for early careerists. 2 National Council on Administrative Fellowships (NCAF) – As a premier program of the National Center for Healthcare Leadership, NCAF is leading the way across the country to build the bridge between practice and academia. It is made up of fellowship sites and graduate health management programs that are working to continuously improve early-career development opportunities for our next generation healthcare leaders. NCAF creates an industry standard in the recruitment for administrative fellows. In doing so, NCAF allows for a uniform and coordinated recruitment process and helps organizations access a national pipeline of the next generation of healthcare industry leaders. NAFCAS (National Council on Administrative Fellowships Centralized Application Service) – This is the one stop shop for students interested in fellowship sites. It provides a seamless way to upload transcripts, personal statement(s), resume, and letter of recommendation. This tool allows for fellowship sites to post opportunities for early careerists graduating from health management programs, organize top applicants, and communicate clearly and directly with candidates. National Center for Healthcare Leadership (NCHL) – Dedicated to advancing healthcare leadership and organizational excellence, NCHL hosts three premier programs under its scope of work, the National Council on Administrative Fellowships, Leadership Excellence Networks (LENS), and US Cooperative for International Patient Programs (USCIPP). NCHL is widely recognized as the premier source for evidence- based healthcare leadership practices, cultivating communities for peer collaboration across organizations, and collectively developing industry models and benchmarks to improve healthcare. Students – Described as an individual within a graduate program focused on health management (MPH, MHA, MHSA, MSHA, etc.) Fellows – Described as individuals participating in an administrative fellowship. INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE ABOUT NCAF? VISIT OUR WEBSITE TO LEARN MORE OR EMAIL US AT [email protected]. 3 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Definitions ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Fellowship Site Benchmarking Survey Analysis ............................................................................................ 5 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Fellowship Recruitment Data .................................................................................................................... 5 Applicant Focused Data ............................................................................................................................ 5 NAFCAS Satisfaction .................................................................................................................................. 6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Fellowship Site Benchmarking Survey Dashboard ........................................................................................ 7 Graduate Program Benchmarking Survey Analysis....................................................................................... 8 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Programmatic Data ................................................................................................................................... 8 Administrative Fellowship Process ........................................................................................................... 8 NAFCAS Satisfaction .................................................................................................................................. 9 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Graduate Program Benchmarking Survey Dashboard ................................................................................ 10 Student Benchmarking Survey Analysis ...................................................................................................... 11 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Fellowship Application Process ............................................................................................................... 11 NAFCAS Satisfaction ................................................................................................................................ 11 Perception of Fellowships ....................................................................................................................... 12 Demographics ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 12 Student Benchmarking Survey Dashboard ................................................................................................. 13 Administrative Fellows Benchmarking Survey Analysis ....................................................................... 14 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 14 Fellows Feedback on Graduate Programs .............................................................................................. 14 Fellowship Format................................................................................................................................... 14 Post-Fellowship Plans ............................................................................................................................. 14 Perception of Fellowships ....................................................................................................................... 15 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 15 4 Administrative Fellows Benchmarking Survey Dashboard .................................................................. 16 5 Fellowship Site Benchmarking Survey Analysis Overview Data from 62 hospitals and health systems were collected between January and March of 2022. The following data is designed to provide results on the dynamics within the field of administrative fellowship recruitment. spans the entire recruitment process from the organization’s point of view. From the decision to recruit through fellowship structure and outcomes for participants. Fellowship Recruitment Data The 2021 – 2022 fellowship site benchmarking survey received 62 responses from hospitals and health systems across the country. For the 2021 – 2022 recruitment cycle, 98% of the responding organizations accepted applications for their administrative fellowship program between June 2021 and January 2022. Of these, a majority recruited using the centralized application service, NAFCAS, and another process (69%) or solely through NAFCAS (30%). For the 2021 – 2022 recruitment cycle, the 62 respondents recruited for a total of 168 fellowship slots. Sites received an average of 70 applications per fellowship slot. Due to ongoing concerns of the COVID- 19 pandemic, many organizations conducted virtual interviews. A total of 1,584 students were interviewed by phone or other virtual methods. On average each organization held 4 in-person interviews per available fellowship slot. Organizations made more offers (191) than slots available (168) due to students dropping out of the interview process. A total of 140 students pulled out of the fellowship recruitment process prior to the offer period. Of the applicants reported by respondents, 1,487 completed a first-round interview. 32.5% of those completed a second-round interview, and only 5% of those completed a third or final round interview. After interviews, organizations ultimately made offers to 191 applicants to fill these roles. Sites reported that the current fellows at their organizations had various types of graduate degrees. Reportedly, master’s degrees were obtained degrees in Health Management (104) Business Administration (54), and Public Health (46). Of the fellows completing their fellowship in the summer of 2022, 85% were hired on into post-fellowship roles. Of the 62 sites, 55 intend on recruiting in the 2022 – 2023 cycle providing 147 fellowship slots. Applicant Focused Data Fellowship sites were surveyed on a variety of applicant specific topics. The top competencies desired of applicants included: • Initiative • Analytical Thinking • Communication Skills (Speaking/Facilitating) • Collaboration • Self-Awareness When reviewing administrative fellowship applications, fellowship sites noted the following aspects of an applicant as most important: • Ability to speak to previous projects or accomplishments • Communication • Critical Thinking • Previous work experience or internship • Diverse background 6 NAFCAS Satisfaction Fellowship sites were asked to rate their satisfaction of recruitment methods, specifically NAFCAS versus traditional methods (career websites, mail-in applications, etc.) In quality of applicants, application process, and offer acceptance process, NAFCAS had higher satisfaction rates compared to traditional methods. 41% responded that their organization is highly satisfied with both the quality of applicants and application process. Conclusion From this data, we see that hospitals and health systems continue to provide administrative fellowship programs to early careerists. Fellowship opportunities continue to remain competitive, with sites engaging with applicants with specific competencies. To learn more about the 2021 – 2022 benchmarking surveys and view a list of the graduate programs and fellowships sites that participate in NCAF, visit www.nchl.org/ncaf. WHAT FELLOWSHIP SITES ARE SAYING "NAFCAS offers us the most exposure to the greatest number of potential applicants. It helps us to stay organized and focused on the recruitment process." of fellows are hired post-fellowship PERSPECTIVES FROM ADMINISTRATIVE FELLOWSHIP SITES RECRUITMENT METHODS Quality of Applicants Application ProcessOffer Acceptance Process SATISFACTION: NAFCAS VERSUS TRADITIONAL METHODS Top 5 Applicant Competencies that Fellowship Sites Look For: Initiative Analytical Thinking Communication Skills Collaboration Self-Awareness 62 fellowship sites of fellowship sites that filled all fellowship slots 90% 70 average number of applications receved per slot 168 fellowship slots available Most Desirable Experiences of Top Fellowship Applicants Included an ability to: Discuss Previous Projects; Clearly Communicate; Demonstrate Critical Thinking; Explain Previous Work Experience; and Highlight a Diverse Background "NAFCAS is the most popular and standardized application methods for administrative fellowships." "Easier to have a centralized application area instead of putting our own in house resources to conduct fellowship cycles." 227 applicants interviewed onsite 191 offers made to fill slots applicants interviewed virtually 1,584 Fellowship Program Locations NAFCAS 69% NAFCAS and another process 30% Other Outlets 2% 85.8%68.6%75.8%71.6% 84.8% 69.6% *Source: National Center for Healthcare Leadership, 2021-2022 NCAF Benchmarking Surveys www.nchl.org/ncaf/[email protected] more information: 8 Graduate Program Benchmarking Survey Analysis Overview Data from 37 graduate programs in health management was collected between January and March of 2022. Respondents provided data on graduating class size, career trajectory of graduates, anecdotal feedback on NCAF and National Council on Administrative Fellowships Centralized Application Service (NAFCAS). This data collection process is designed to monitor dynamics of the early careerist experience, with a specific highlight on administrative fellowships, as well as the impact of NCAF activity on outcomes for students and graduate programs. The following data includes the demographics of responding graduate programs and the graduate program faculty experience through the recruitment process for administrative fellowships. NCAF has collected data on interview outcomes as well as anecdotal feedback on the recruitment process from both student and faculty perspective. Programmatic Data 37 health management graduate programs responded to the 2021 – 2022 benchmarking survey. Of these programs, 68% were National Council on Administrative Fellowship members and 94% were accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education (CAHME). Between 2019 and 2022, median program size of health management programs grew from 20 to 25. Graduating class sizes for 2022 ranged from 4 to 80 students. Administrative Fellowship Process Of the reported students that graduated in 2022, 38% pursued fellowships during the 2021 – 2022 recruitment cycle compared to 49% of students in 2019. 70% of these students received at least one offer for an administrative fellowship position. The percentage of students receiving at least one fellowship increased 5% between 2019 and 2022. Responding programs reported a total of 1,098 graduating students in 2022. Of these students, 417 students pursued fellowships in the 2021 – 2022 cycle. These statistics show that the number of early careerists entering the healthcare workforce is continuing to rise, though not all are pursuing an administrative fellowship directly after graduation. NCAF members receive two fee waivers each administrative fellowship recruitment cycle. Of the responding graduate programs that were NCAF members, 48% provided both NAFCAS fee waivers to their students. In the search for administrative fellowships, NAFCAS is one of the most referenced resources. Graduate programs refer students to: •ACHE Post-Graduate Fellowship Listing •Hospital/Health System Careers Page •LinkedIn •NAHSE Website 9 NCAF surveys collected the same data from students, which showed that although the exact order varied, the top four resources used by students and referred by programs were the same. Graduate programs reported the median salary for students that accepted fellowships after graduation. The average of these salaries was $62,718. NAFCAS Satisfaction Graduate programs reported higher satisfaction rates for quality of administrative fellowship sites (NCAF = 4.73, non-NCAF = 4.64) and application process timeline (NCAF = 4.44, non-NCAF = 4.13) for the centralized application service, NAFCAS, compared to non-NCAF fellowship sites. Graduate programs were asked about the advantages to applying to NCAF-member fellowship sites. The top two results were the searchable directory of fellowships (NAFCAS) and the ease of application process for their students. Graduate programs were also asked about the perceived disadvantages to applying to NCAF- member fellowship sites. 14 graduate programs noted no perceived disadvantages. The remaining programs noted either cost of application (15 programs), timeline or timing of applications (11 programs), or limited number of fellowship opportunities (9 programs) as perceived disadvantages from the student perspective. Conclusion From this data, we see that the number of early careerists entering the workforce is on the rise, while trends show us that students are pursuing full-time jobs as well as administrative fellowships. NAFCAS data continues to show us that both students and faculty find the centralized application service a valuable tool in finding and selecting administrative fellowships. To learn more about the 2021 – 2022 benchmarking surveys and view a list of the graduate programs and fellowships sites that participate in NCAF, visit www.nchl.org/ncaf. 49% 65% 38% 70% EASE OF APPLICATION SEARCHABLE DIRECTORY ADHERENCE TO A CODE OF GOOD PRACTICE EASE OF OBTAINING RECOMMENDATION LETTERS PERSPECTIVES FROM GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT TOP REASONS GRADUATE PROGRAMS PROMOTE THE USE OF NAFCAS (N=29) 37 graduate program respondents Graduate Program Locations Percentage of students that applied to fellowships N=1,098 (2021) Percentage of students that received 1+ fellowship offer N=1,098 (2021) TOP FELLOWSHIP SEARCH RESOURCES NAFCAS; ACHE Post-Fellowship Listing; Hospitals & Health Systems Career Pages; LinkedIn; NAHSE Website; Information Sessions 2018 2021 2018 2021 38% of graduating students applied for administrative fellowships *Source: National Center for Healthcare Leadership, 2021-2022 NCAF Benchmarking Surveys 1,098 total number of graduating students reported It is easier from a program director position to track students applying through NAFCAS; it is also easier to encourage them to apply through the second round. Students appreciate the one-stop shopping of NAFCAS All of our students utilize the NAFCAS process and procedures. of students are satisfied with the NAFCAS application process of faculty are satisfied with the NAFCAS application process WHAT GRADUATE SCHOOLS ARE SAYING www.nchl.org/ncaf/[email protected] more information: of responding programs were CAHME accredited of responding programs were National Council on Administrative Fellowships (NCAF) members 11 Student Benchmarking Survey Analysis Overview The National Council on Administrative Fellowships (NCAF) completed the 5 th annual survey after hiatus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from 235 students was collected between January and March of 2022. Respondents provided recruitment data, anecdotal feedback on NCAF, satisfaction on National Council on Administrative Fellowships Centralized Application Service (NAFCAS), and the fellowship interviewing process. This data collection process is designed to monitor dynamics within the field of administrative fellowships, as well as the impact of NCAF activity on outcomes. The following data spans the entire recruitment process from the student’s career trajectory and fellowship application process. Fellowship Application Process For the 2021 – 2022 cycle, 91% of surveyed students applied for administrative fellowships. In their fellowship search, students identified several important factors when deciding to pursue a fellowship site. The top factors included: •Opportunity to Stay at the Organization •Mentorship Opportunities •Opportunity to Get a Wide Variety of Experiences When applying to fellowships, 72% utilized both NAFCAS and traditional methods (mail in, career pages, etc.). Applicants submitted a median of 8 applications, which one hour was spent on each. Applications submitted through NAFCAS took less time to complete compared to traditional methods (62.5 minutes versus 66.7 minutes). Students were asked about the various resources utilized in their search for fellowships. The top four indicated by students were: •Hospital & Health System Career Page •LinkedIn •Information Session •ACHE Post-Graduate Fellowship Listing Of those surveyed, 78% received a fellowship offer. Of these, 90% accepted their offer. The students that did not accept their offer chose to accept a full-time job offer instead. NAFCAS Satisfaction Students were asked about their satisfaction with the centralized application service, NAFCAS. Trended data shows us that student’s satisfaction has increased each year. On a scale from 1 to 5, satisfaction with the quality of sites increased from 4.28 to 4.42. Satisfaction with the quantity of sites increased from 3.86 to 3.98 and satisfaction with the application process increased from 3.92 to 4.09. Overall, student satisfaction with the centralized application service has increased over time, with the annual review of the code of good practice and addition of the several new fellowship sites each year. 12 Perception of Fellowships Respondents were asked about their perceptions and the current state of administrative fellowships. 89% of students consider administrative fellowships an opportunity for career advancement. At the same time, 53% of students considered other post-graduate opportunities in lieu of an administrative fellowship. Though fellowships are still widely popular among early careerists, we see graduating students also pursuing full time jobs, additional graduate school, internships, and part-time work opportunities. Demographics Students that participated in the 2021 – 2022 benchmarking survey were diverse across age, gender, and race/ethnicity. 67% respondents were between the ages of 18 and 24. A majority of responding students were White (161), with Asian students (71), Black or African American students (47), and Hispanic or Latino students (31) rounding out the remainder of the respondent group. 67% of students self-identified as female, 32% as male, 1 student identified as genderqueer, and 2 students declined to answer. Conclusion From this data, we see that students continue to find administrative fellowships to be a valuable post- graduate opportunity. The graduating classes are increasingly diverse and looking for diverse opportunities to pursue. Students utilize several resources to find and chose administrative fellowships with NAFCAS being top of the list. To learn more about the 2021 – 2022 benchmarking surveys and view a list of the graduate programs and fellowships sites that participate in NCAF, visit www.nchl.org/ncaf. Over 35: 5% 25 - 34: 44% 18 - 24: 67% Genderqueer: 0.3% Declined: 0.6% Male: 32% Female: 67% "I enjoyed the streamlined nature of the (NAFCAS) process and the ability to track my progress on each application." "It (fellowships) provide the opportunities necessary to excel in the workforce." 87% 53% 89% *Source: National Center for Healthcare Leadership, 2021-2022 NCAF Benchmarking Surveys www.nchl.org/ncaf/[email protected] more information: Top Fellowship Search Resources NAFCAS ACHE Post-Fellowship Listing Hospitals & Health Systems Career Pages LinkedIn NAHSE Website Informational Sessions from Fellowship Sites NET PROMOTER SCORE Student's likelihood of recommending fellowships to peers 8.9 8.9 Top Sectors Pursued Outside of Fellowships Government Foundation & Volunteer Agencies Community Health Consulting Firms Military Health An average of is spent on each fellowship application 1 hour 1 hour On average, students submit fellowship applications through NAFCAS 6 6 Application Process 4.09 / 5.0 Satisfaction with NAFCAS WHAT STUDENTS ARE SAYING "I believe that administrative fellowships offer graduates the opportunity to be exposed to a wide range of fields & opportunities prior to beginning their full-time position. also pursued full-time job opportunities Quality of Sites of students considered other post-graduate opportunities in lieu of administrative fellowships PERSPECTIVES FROM STUDENTS ON ADMINISTRATIVE FELLOWSHIPS Important Factors on Students' Decision to Pursue a Fellowship of students find administrative fellowships an opportunity for career advancement 91% of responding students applied to administrative fellowships 72% of students used both NAFCAS and traditional methods graduating students responded 309 61% are pursuing an MHA, MHSA, or MSHA Opportunity to stay at organization Mentorship Opportunity Job Market Opportunity for varied experiences Fellowship program's recognition ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL VERY IMPORTANT VERY IMPORTANT VERY IMPORTANT 4.2/5.0 Student Respondent Demographics Hispanic or Latino: 10.8% American Indian or Alaskan Native: 1.04% Asian: 24.7% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: .35% Black or African American: 16.4% White: 56.4% 14 Administrative Fellows Benchmarking Survey Analysis Overview Data from administrative fellows perspective was collected between January and March of 2022. Respondents provided both recruitment data and anecdotal feedback on NCAF, National Council on Administrative Fellowships Centralized Application Service (NAFCAS), and the fellowship recruitment process. This data collection process is designed to monitor dynamics within the field of administrative fellowships, as well as the impact of NCAF activity on outcomes. The following data spans the recruitment process from the fello w’s perspective and specifics on the aspects if their fellowship program. Fellows Feedback on Graduate Programs Fellows were asked a variety of questions around their fellowship program, including areas most and least prepared for. Fellows felt most prepared in: •Collaboration •Communication Skills (Writing) •Communication Skills (Speaking/Facilitating) •Initiative Fellows felt least prepared in: •Financial Skills •Human Resources Management •Information Technology Management •Project Management Fellowship Format Respondents were asked about the style and length of the fellowship program at their organization. 57% of respondents had a 12-month fellowship. Most fellows participated in a program that was partially or fully projected based. 50% of responding fellows reported that their organization recruits between 1 and 3 fellows annually. During their fellowship, responding fellows worked approximately 45 hours per week, with 30% of those hours being remote. In their program, each fellow has the unique opportunity to work in a variety of roles and departments. Of the fellows that responded, these were the top areas fellows contributed to: •Executive Leadership •Operations •Clinic/Outpatient Services •Process Improvement •Strategic Planning Post-Fellowship Plans Fellows typically begin to plan their post-fellowship career trajectory in the last six months of their fellowship. In 2022, 67% of fellows reported that they will be completing the full-term of their fellowship as expected. At the time of survey, 55% intended on staying at their organization for a post-fellowship position, while 34% did not yet accept a post-fellowship position. Because of the well-rounded experience of the fellowship, fellows entered a wide range of departments. 15 •Ambulatory •Clinical Operations •Oncology •Heart Center •Community Health •Community Physician Group •Outpatient Services •Hospital Administration •Corporate •Dermatology •Perioperative Services •Respiratory •Digestive Health •Family Medicine •Planning and Operations •Innovation •Finance •Head and Neck •Radiology/Medical Imaging •Strategy & Analytics •Heart Center •Hospital Administration •Respiratory •Neurology •Nursing •Market & Network Services •System Operations & Quality In these departments, fellows reported a starting salary range between $70,000 and $199,000, with the majority ranging between $80,000 and $89,999. Trended data shows the salary of administrative fellows increasing over time. (2018: between $65,000 and $99,999). Perception of Fellowships The fellows benchmarking survey asked about their perceptions of fellowships. 97% of fellows believe that fellowships are a valuable opportunity for career advancement. Fellows reported a net promoter score of 40, confirming that 54% of fellows would be promoters of administrative fellowships. Conclusion Fellows continue to receive high quality education from health management programs across the U.S as they enter leadership roles in hospitals and health systems. Data shows that fellowship sites continue to recruit new fellows to provide insight into various departments of the organization. Fellows continue to see the value of the experiential learning of administrative fellowships and are a vital source in the ongoing recruitment of early careerists. 57% 97% 61% 59% *Source: National Center for Healthcare Leadership, 2021-2022 NCAF Benchmarking Surveys www.nchl.org/ncaf/[email protected] more information: Prevalent Areas in Fellowship Programs POST GRADUATE SCHOOL FELLOWS FELT PERSPECTIVES FROM CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE FELLOWS of respondents had 12-month fellowships. of respondents expected to complete the full term of their program. Top Departments Fellows are Hired Into Ambulatory | Clinical Operations | Community Health | Community Physician Group | Corporate | Dermatology | Digestive Health | Family Medicine | Finance | Fellowship Salary Range Fellowship Program Locations of respondents had a fellowship that was both rotational and project-based. "Pushed me to think critically, provided great mentorship advice, helped to connect information and answer questions about the organization." "Empowered me to be confident in myself and my leadership abilities, as well as pursue passions outside of my day to day work." "Weekly and bi-weekly check-ins were helpful; advice on how to navigate difficult situations; advocating on my behalf in projects and rotations makes me feel valued and supported." Executive Leadership Operations Clinic/Outpatient Services Process Improvement Strategic Planning 90% 88% 75% 74% 74% of fellows believe that FELLOWSHIPS ARE A VALUABLE OPPORTUNITY FOR CAREER ADVANCEMENT $80,000 - $84,999 $100,000 - $109,999 $90,000 - $94,999 $85,000 - $89,999 $75,000 - $79,999 $70,000 - $74,999 *No responses for $110,000 - $119,999 salary range and one response for $120,000 - $129,999. Collaboration Communication Skills (Writing) Communication Skills (Speaking/Facilitating) Initiative Professional & Social Responsibility BEST PREPARED FOR: Financial Skills Human Resources Management Information Technology Management Project Management Talent Development LEAST PREPARED FOR: $95,000 - $99,999 WHAT FELLOWS ARE SAYING ABOUT THEIR FELLOWSHIP PRECEPTORS AVERAGE % OF HOURS WORKED REMOTE 30% 30% 45 Hrs 45 Hrs AVERAGE NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED PER WEEK 7% 19% 30% 15% 11% 7% 7%